2022. 9. 3. 23:43ㆍLSAT엘셋
Don’t panic when you don’t know what the answer choices are saying. Chances are high that those ACs are wrong questions. Just skim through the ACs until you see the correct one. If you don’t find the right AC, then just go through the ACs one more time, more carefully than the first time to see if you have missed any details.
Correlation -> Probable Causation
PT14 S4 Q8
PT53 S1 Q19 (A)
Correlation/Causation Mistakes
PT40 S1 Q23
PT53 S1 Q19 (A)
Temporal Causation
PT4 S4 Q20
Conditional Reasoning + Causation
PT3 S4 Q3 ( A->B, Not B because Not A.)
Not A -> B can C. Not B, not from C, but from A.
PT53 S3 #23
Conditional Reasoning Repeat Form (Modus Ponens):
PT22 S2 Q16 CC (E) (Main premise in the middle with a sufficient indicator appearing in the midst of the sentence)
PT18 S2 Q13 CC (C) (Conditional reasoning appearing later and it is hidden by superfluous information earlier in the stimulus).
PT19 S4 Q24 CC (A) (Conditional reasoning and affirmation of the sufficient condition appearing all in one sentence, Difficult)
PT33 S1 Q23 (B)
PT15 S3 Q13
PT18 S2 Q13
PT46 S2 Q18 (C), Inductive Reasoning Element included
Conditional Reasoning Repeat Form, a third-party opinion
PT70 S1 Q19 (C)
Conditional Reasoning Chain Rule
PT31 S3 Q18 (A)x
PT3 S2 Q1
PT54 S2 Q23 (C)
PT54 S4 Q25 (C)
PT57 S2 Q19 (C), The AC appear in contrapositive form.
Modus Tollens/Contrapositive:
PT28 S1 Q13 CC (C) (Pseudo/Loose-contrapositive, all the other ACs blatantly wrong, POE., 1 premise, 1 intermed. Conclusion, 1 major conclusion to match)
PT20 S4 Q15 CC (B)
PT21 S3 Q22 CC (C)
PT21 S3 Q22
PT25 S2 Q22
PT30 S4 Q9 (B)
PT40 S3 Q25 (Assumption Needed.)
PT1 S3 Q6
PT6 S3 Q14
PT7 S1 Q13
PT9 S2 Q25 (Variation)
PT12 S1 Q23
PT15 S2 Q18
PT71 S1 Q21 (C), Modifier important.
Similar question: PT31 S2 Q21 (C) (Modifiers are important)
DeMorgan’s Law
PT23 S3 Q18 CC (C) (And/Or, Common sense assumption needed, read carefully)
PTB S1 Q12 (DeMorgan’s Law)
PT41 S1 Q15 (C)
Conditional Reasoning MISC
PT26 S2 Q16 CC (Or) (C)
PT18 S4 Q20 CC (A) (Sufficient condition not being triggered)
PT20 S1 Q19 CC (D) (Dual Premises each independently supporting the conclusion).
PT23 S2 Q25 CC (B) (Chain, the Correct Answer muddied with relative pronouns.)
PT39 S2 Q8 (A -> B or C, Not B & Not C -> Not A.)
PT32 S1 Q16 (A)
PT18 S4 Q20 (‘A’ case does not fall under the conditional reasoning ‘B’ -> ‘C’.)
PT57 S3 Q20 (E)
Conditional Reasoning SOME
PT1 S4 Q24
PT17 S3 Q13 CC (Some) (D)
Mistaken Reversal (Affirming the Consequent)
PT41 S3 Q24 (E) (Mistaken Reversal Variation), A -> B. B. Therefore, Might be A.
Analogy
PT25 S4 Q22 CC (C) (Improbable, Have X but not use X is like, have Y but not use Y.)
PT25 S4 Q20 (Has the capability but do not use it.)
PT11 S2 Q25 (Toxic in large does, beneficial in small dose.)
Transitive Property
PT19 S2 Q20 CC (B) (Quasi-transitive property.)
PT30 S2 Q14 (D) (A CAN cause B, B CAN cause C, therefore, A CAN cause C.)
A-> B or C. Not B. if A, then C.
PT24 S2 Q13 CC (D)
Direct Proportionality
PT24 S3 Q21 CC (A)
According to X, A never happens. According to Y, A happens. If X is correct, either Y is wrong or Y happens in a way that is compatible with X.
PT33 S3 Q22 CC (C)
This question is famous (in our class) for demonstrating The Conclusion Shortcut on Matching questions.
Since the answer choices to Matching questions are so long and dense, it sometimes worth it to JUST find the conclusion on the 1st pass and see if the answer choice even has a shot.
Because our original conclusion is such a particular type of claim, a conditional statement with an either/or in the consequence, it'll be pretty easy to search for. - - Manhattan ohthatpatrick -.
X’ vs. Y’ is a bigger issue than X vs Y.
PT17 S2 Q24 CC (A) (Key word: “Deflecting attention from the fact.”)
Ad Hominem (Source Attack)
PT28 S3 Q26 CC (D)
A -> B, B is prioritized over A because B is a necessary condition for A.
PT29 S1 Q13 CC (E) (Except question type)
The higher the A, the Higher the B.
PT35 S4 Q23 CC (D)
One factor is not sufficient to guarantee a conclusion. You need at least one other factor.
PT22 S4 Q20 CC (B)
Circular Reasoning
PT25 S2 Q22 CC (Quasi) (A)
Some, Most
PT27 S1 Q26 CC (D)
Contradiction
PT34 S2 Q6 (B)
False Dilemma
PT34 S3 Q25 (A) ( Jordan: “A” -> Negative Outcome, NOT “A” -> Negative Outcome Also. We have a dilemma. Terry: “A” can happen without negative consequences.)
Affirming the Consequent
PT1 S3 Q2
A some B; A some Not B. Therefore, B is not essential to A.
Whole vs. Individual
PT4 S1 Q20
Usually X, but this time it’s NOT X. Exception.
PT5 S1 Q20
Current policy, what is the case, and then what it should be like.
PT7 S4 Q25
All birds have wings, but not all birds use wings to fly
PT8 S1 Q16
Your reason for NOT doing B is not enough. Because you’re doing C, D, E, etc. that shares the same problems as B.
PT10 S4 Q12
Determined either by A or B. A applies to all. So it must be B that is a determining factor.
PT13 S4 Q24
No reason to get angry. It results in either A or B, and both results are rational outcomes.
PT4 S4 Q15
Comparison
PT9 S4 Q15
PT16 S2 Q19
Deflection
PT17 S2 Q24
What some others claim vs. two other sources
PT13 S2 Q8
A principle that leads to equal conflicts
PT14 S2 Q15
Conflict
PT6 S2 Q25
Inference
PT16 S3 Q22
Relative Comparison. # of A > # of B. Each A is in B. Therefore, at least one B has more than one A.
PTA S4 Q23
A and B are different. A doesn’t necessarily guarantee B.
PT47 S1 Q15
Among the set of A, B, C, D, etc. A is the easiest. So emphasize A when doing the set that includes others as well.
PT47 S3 Q18
Prohibiting B leads to C, which is worse than B. So don’t prohibit B.
PT31 S2 Q23 (B)
Matching ‘AND’ / ‘OR’
PT39 S2 Q8 (B)
Counter-intuitive results
PT39 S4 Q24 (E)
Offset. Overall not better.
PT38 S1 Q22 (C)
X in itself is not the problem. How we DO X matters.
PT53 S3 Q23 (D)
Sample Size error
PT61 S4 Q9 (D)
Structure/Reasoning Similarity
PT71 S1 Q12 (B) Infinite Regress
A and B similar. Causes of B. Causes of A superset.
PT71 S3 Q15 (A)
A->B-> C or D. If not C, then Not A or D.
PT71 S3 Q24 (A)
'LSAT엘셋' 카테고리의 다른 글
Point At Issue (0) | 2022.09.03 |
---|---|
Parallel Flaw (0) | 2022.09.03 |
Necessary Assumptions (0) | 2022.09.03 |
Method(Argument) - Pattern (0) | 2022.09.03 |
Flaw - Fails to consider other possibilities (0) | 2022.04.05 |